A practical reference on Chromatogram: what it is, how it behaves, what the literature reports, and where the honest uncertainties sit.
This page was last updated on 2026-01-16 and is reviewed periodically as new material appears.
Quality control laboratories use HPLC to check identity, purity, concentration, and stability of raw materials and finished products. A validated method specifies the column, mobile phase, flow rate, detection wavelength, injection volume, and run time. Samples are prepared and compared against reference standards of known concentration. The resulting chromatogram provides quantitative data, such as assay values and impurity levels. This approach is common in pharmaceutical, food, environmental, and industrial testing where consistent measurements are required.
Method validation demonstrates that an analytical procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical validation characteristics include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Regulatory guidance from bodies such as the International Council for Harmonisation and the United States Pharmacopeia outlines expectations, though specific criteria depend on the product and method. System suitability tests are run before sample analysis to confirm resolution, peak symmetry, column efficiency, and injection repeatability. Failure of these checks can invalidate a batch of measurements.
Validation demonstrates that a method is suitable for its intended use. Typical performance characteristics include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Regulators and standards organizations provide frameworks, but specific requirements depend on the application and jurisdiction. System suitability tests are run before sample analysis to confirm resolution, peak symmetry, retention time repeatability, and sensitivity. A validated method is not permanently fixed; changes may require partial or full revalidation.
Routine HPLC testing depends on controlled reagents, calibrated instruments, and documented procedures. Columns degrade over time, so retention times and peak shapes are monitored for drift. Mobile phases are filtered and degassed to prevent pump damage and detector noise. Reference standards must be traceable and stored under suitable conditions. Data handling systems record injections, calculations, and audit trails. Quality control samples interspersed with unknowns help detect errors during a run.
Developing an HPLC method begins with defining the purpose, such as quantifying a main component, measuring impurities, or confirming identity. Analysts select separation mode, column, mobile phase, detection, and sample preparation based on analyte properties and matrix. Experiments vary solvent strength, pH, buffer type, and temperature to achieve resolution between critical peaks. The goal is a robust method that produces reliable results across instruments and operators. Method development often involves trial runs and statistical optimization.
| Parameter | Typical acceptance criterion | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | ≥ 1.5 | Baseline separation of adjacent peaks |
| Tailing factor | ≤ 2.0 | Peak symmetry measure |
| Theoretical plates | > 2000 | Column efficiency indicator |
| Injection repeatability | ≤ 2% RSD | Relative standard deviation for replicate injections |
| Linearity | r² ≥ 0.995 | Calibration curve over the working range |
Routine quality control monitors retention time shifts, baseline noise, system pressure, and peak shape. Trends can reveal column aging, mobile phase preparation errors, detector drift, or sample degradation. Corrective actions may include replacing the column, preparing fresh mobile phase, or recalibrating the detector. Stability testing often uses HPLC to measure parent compound loss and degradation product formation. Open questions remain about how accelerated stability results extrapolate to long-term storage under varied conditions.
Quality control for HPLC testing combines scheduled checks, documented procedures, and review of results. Before sample analysis, system suitability testing confirms that the instrument, column, and method meet predefined criteria. Common criteria include resolution between critical peaks, retention time precision, peak tailing, and theoretical plate count. Failure triggers investigation before results are reported. Records link raw data, calculations, instrument logs, and analyst identity to each batch, supporting audits and repeat analysis.
Method validation evaluates accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limit, quantitation limit, and robustness. Regulatory guidance for pharmaceuticals, foods, and environmental testing defines expected documentation and acceptance criteria. Verification confirms that a validated method works in a specific laboratory with its own instruments and reagents. Calibration curves use reference standards with known purity and traceability, while measurement uncertainty is estimated from validation data, control charts, and collaborative studies. The scope of validation depends on the method's intended use.
Separation in HPLC depends on the chemistry of the stationary phase, the composition of the mobile phase, and the physical properties of the column. Reverse-phase separations use a nonpolar stationary phase and a polar mobile phase, and they are common for many organic compounds. Ion-exchange, size-exclusion, and normal-phase modes serve other classes of analytes. Gradient elution changes solvent strength over time, while isocratic elution holds it constant. Flow rate, temperature, particle size, and column length all influence peak shape and resolution. Detection may use ultraviolet absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry, depending on the analyte and the required sensitivity.
Routine HPLC testing compares a sample result with a calibration curve prepared from known reference standards. Peak area or peak height is plotted against concentration, and the curve is used to estimate unknown amounts. Retention time supports tentative identification when compared with a standard, though mass spectrometry or another confirmatory method may be needed for definitive identification. Pre-run checks verify repeatability, resolution, and peak symmetry before sample analysis. Limits of detection and quantification describe the smallest amounts that can be reliably observed or measured. Sample preparation, filtration, and degassing help prevent column damage and inconsistent results.
High-performance liquid chromatography is an analytical technique that separates components in a liquid sample by passing them through a packed column under pressure. A pump delivers a mobile phase at a controlled flow rate, and an injector introduces the sample into the stream. Differences in how analytes partition between the mobile phase and the stationary phase cause them to exit the column at different times. Detection then records a signal proportional to the amount of each separated substance. The resulting chromatogram provides retention times and peak areas for identification and quantification.
Instrumentation includes a solvent delivery system, an autosampler, a column oven, and one or more detectors. Reversed-phase columns with chemically modified silica are widely used, but normal-phase, ion-exchange, size-exclusion, and affinity modes exist for specific separations. Detectors may rely on ultraviolet absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry. Column temperature, mobile phase composition, and flow rate are adjusted to improve resolution. System pressure is monitored because rising pressure can indicate column blockage or deteriorating packing.
In biochemistry, control coefficients are used to describe how much influence a given reaction step has on the flux or concentration of the species at steady state. This can be accomplished experimentally by changing the expression level of a given enzyme and measuring the resulting changes in flux and metabolite levels. In theory, any observables, such as growth rate, or even combinations of observables, can be defined using a control coefficient; but flux and concentration control coefficients are by far the most commonly used. The simplest way to look at control coefficients is as the scaled derivatives of the steady-state change in an observable with respect to a change in enzyme activity (ei for each species i). For example, the flux control coefficients (C Jei, where J is the reaction rate) can be written as: C e i J = d J d e i e i J = d ln J d ln e i ≈ J % e i % {\displaystyle C_{e_{i}}^{J}={\frac {dJ}{de_{i}}}{\frac {e_{i}}{J}}={\frac {d\ln J}{d\ln e_{i}}}\approx {\frac {J\%}{e_{i}\%}}}
It was initially thought that resistance of 4-aminosalicylic acid came from a mutation affecting dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). However, it was discovered that it was caused by a mutation affecting the dihydrofolate synthesis (DHFS) enzyme activity. The mutations of isoleucine 43, arginine 49, serine 150, phenylalanine 152, glutamate 153, and alanine 183 were found to affect the binding pocket of the dihydrofolate synthase enzyme. This will reduce the ability for HO-H2Pte to bind to DHFS so that less of OH-H2PteGlu is made.
In 2011, actor John Abraham responding to allegations that his face looked "puffy" from steroid use stated that he used "No steroids" and used protein and multivitamins. In a 2013 interview, British-Indian model Upen Patel also refutes ever taking steroids, and states that he was always athletic. In 2018, actor Sanjay Dutt refused the allegations that his 1990s physique was due to steroids use, arguing that back then both steroids and protein powders weren't widespread, Dutt saying that he relied only on diet. http://in.movies.yahoo.com/news-detail/17113/Stars-steroids-enhance-performance.html
7. Ir Med J. 2013 May;106(5):148-9. Atypical melanocytic naevi following melanotan injection. Reid C(1), Fitzgerald T, Fabre A, Kirby B. Author information: (1)Dermatology Department, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4. C.Reid@st-vincents.ie Melanotan is a synthetic analogue of alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone (a-MSH) that stimulates melanogenesis. It is sold on the internet and tanning salons as a quick 'tanning jab'. We report a patient who developed multiple new onset atypical naevi within one week of receiving two Melanotan injections. This case highlights the potential risk of Melanotan in stimulating dysplastic naevi or possibly malignant melanoma.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
In some reactions, protons and hydroxide may directly act as acid and base in term of specific acid and specific base catalysis. But more often groups in substrate and active site act as Brønsted–Lowry acid and base. This is called general acid and general base theory. The easiest way to distinguish between them is to check whether the reaction rate is determined by the concentrations of the general acid and base. If the answer is yes then the reaction is the general type. Since most enzymes have an optimum pH of 6 to 7, the amino acids in the side chain usually have a pKa of 4~10. Candidate include aspartate, glutamate, histidine, cysteine. These acids and bases can stabilise the nucleophile or electrophile formed during the catalysis by providing positive and negative charges.
Cl−indicators can be designed on the basis of endogenously expressed fluorescent proteins such as Yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). An advantage of endogenously expressed probes over dye-based probes is their ability to achieve cell-type-specificity by the choice of Promoter (genetics) promotor. YFP based indicators are mutated forms of Green fluorescent protein (GFP). YFP contains four point mutations and has a red-shifted excitation and emission spectrum compared with GFP. YFP fluorescence is sensitive to various small anions with relative potencies iodine > nitrate > chloride > bromide > formate > acetate. YFP sensitivity to these small anions results from ground-state binding near the chromophore, which apparently alters the chromophore ionization constant and hence the fluorescence emission. The fluorescence of YFP is sensitive to [Cl− ] and pH. The effect is fully reversible. YFP is excited at visible range and is a genetically encoded probe. YFP based Cl− sensors have rather low kinetics of Cl− association / dissociation. The half time association/dissociation constants for YFP mutant range from 50 ms (YFP-H148Q I152L) to 2 sec (YFP-H148Q V163S). If a fluorescent indicators is based on one fluorescent protein only, it doesn't allow for ratiometric measurements. Hence, a rationale for ratiometric fluorescent indicators results.
AM concentrations are substantially elevated during intense inflammation from disorders like sepsis, rendering AM a potentially viable therapeutic agent and clinical mode of monitoring such inflammation. AM contributes to vasodilation, which could be detrimental in leading to septic shock. Researchers seek to mitigate this effect while maintaining ADM's antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and endothelial-protective characteristics by employing antibodies that bind to ADM's N-terminus or co-administering ADM with ADM-binding protein-1, which collectively extend ADM's half-life and increase its maintenance role while minimizing this detrimental vasodilation. While AM has been discussed in regard to its implications for bacterial infections, such as sepsis, prior research explores its potential connection to viral infections too. This annunciates the importance of continual investigation into AM's mechanisms with viral illnesses through exploring its roles in inflammation and immune regulation.
Immune evasion proteins from Staphylococcus aureus have a significant conservation of protein structures and a range of activities that are all directed at the two key elements of host immunity, complement and neutrophils. These secreted virulence factors assist the bacterium in surviving immune response mechanisms. Examples of toxins produced by strains of S. aureus include enterotoxins that cause food-poisoning, exfoliative toxins that cause scalded skin syndrome, and toxic-shock syndrome toxin (TSST) that underlies toxic shock syndrome. These toxin examples are classified as superantigens. Multi-drug resistant S. aureus strains also produce alpha toxin, classified as a pore-forming toxin, which can cause abscesses.
73. Bromocriptine. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®) [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2006–. 2026 Sep 15. Bromocriptine is usually not used during breastfeeding because it suppresses lactation. The indication of lactation suppression has been withdrawn in the U.S. and discouraged in other countries because it increases the risk of maternal stroke, seizures, cardiovascular disorders, death and possibly psychosis.[1-4] A low dose of 2.5 mg once daily has been used for 3 days to decrease overproduction of milk.[5] The drug was undetectable in milk with this dosage and infants had no adverse reactions, but the safety of this use is not clearly established. Postpartum women may clear bromocriptine more rapidly than others.[6] Case reports and series also exist of mothers treated with bromocriptine for amenorrhea-galactorrhea syndrome or prolactinoma during pregnancy and lactation who successfully breastfed their infants. Bromocriptine has been used to treat persistent galactorrhea following breast augmentation surgery.[7] It has also been used to mitigate hyperprolactinemia and galactorrhea caused by antipsychotic therapy.[8]
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
The American Society for Quality (ASQ), formerly the American Society for Quality Control (ASQC), is a society of quality professionals, with more than 30,000 members, in more than 140 countries. ASQC was established on 16 February 1946 by 253 members in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with George D. Edwards as its first president. The organization was first created as a way for quality experts and manufacturers to sustain quality-improvement techniques used during World War II. In 1948, ASQC's Code of Ethics established standards for members to conduct their activities and business. Business writer Armand V. Feigenbaum served as president of the society in 1961–63. In 1997, the members of the organization voted to change its name from "American Society for Quality Control" to "American Society for Quality".
The primary medical treatment of acromegaly is to use somatostatin analogues – octreotide (Sandostatin) or lanreotide (Somatuline). Somatostatin analogues are also sometimes used to shrink large tumors before surgery. Because octreotide inhibits gastrointestinal and pancreatic function, long-term use causes digestive problems such as loose stools, nausea, and gas in one-third of people. In addition, approximately 25 percent of people with acromegaly develop gallstones, which are usually asymptomatic. In some cases, octreotide treatment can cause diabetes because somatostatin and its analogues can inhibit the release of insulin. With an aggressive adenoma that is not able to be operated on, there may be a resistance to octreotide in which case a second-generation SSA, pasireotide, may be used for tumor control. However, insulin and glucose levels should be carefully monitored as pasireotide has been associated with hyperglycemia by reducing insulin secretion.
The AAA proteins contain two domains, an N-terminal alpha/beta domain that binds and hydrolyzes nucleotides (a Rossmann fold) and a C-terminal alpha-helical domain. The N-terminal domain is 200-250 amino acids long and contains Walker A and Walker B motifs, and is shared in common with other P-loop NTPases, the superfamily which includes the AAA family. Most AAA proteins have additional domains that are used for oligomerization, substrate binding and/or regulation. These domains can lie N- or C-terminal to the AAA module. Some classes of AAA proteins have an N-terminal non-ATPase domain which is followed by either one or two AAA domains (D1 and D2). In some proteins with two AAA domains, both are evolutionarily well conserved (like in Cdc48/p97). In others, either the D2 domain (like in Pex1p and Pex6p) or the D1 domain (in Sec18p/NSF) is better conserved in evolution. While the classical AAA family was based on motifs, the family has been expanded using structural information and is now termed the AAA family.
Camurus' FluidCrystal are available as injectable depots and topical bioadhesive delivery technologies. By encapsulating the drug compound in the nanostructures, injectable depots are able to deliver therapeutic levels of drug substance over extended periods from a single injection. This leads to a decrease in traditional side effects associated with high initial drug release on injection (drug burst), poor drug stability, and complex processing requirements, making the system highly suitable for sustained parental delivery of peptides, proteins, and small molecule drug compounds. The topical delivery system creates a bio-adhesive film that provides local and continual release of drug compounds. The delivery system is suited for delivery of peptide, protein, and small molecule drug compounds and can be applied to dermal, buccal, ophthalmic, nasal, vaginal, and other topical surfaces.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Method validation is the documented process of confirming that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended use. It evaluates accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limits, and robustness. Validation criteria depend on the regulatory context and the sample type.
System suitability tests are short checks performed before or during an HPLC run to verify instrument and method performance. They often include resolution, tailing factor, theoretical plates, and injection precision. Results must meet predefined limits for sample data to be accepted.
HPLC retention time alone cannot definitively identify an unknown substance. A match with a reference standard under identical conditions provides supporting evidence. Confirmation typically requires mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, or another orthogonal technique.
It is a set of checks performed before or during an HPLC run to confirm the system works as expected. Parameters may include resolution, tailing factor, theoretical plates, and retention time precision. Failure can trigger maintenance, method adjustment, or repeat analysis.